TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Honolulu Lumber Co., Ltd. v. American Factors, Ltd.

Honolulu Lumber Co., Ltd. v. American Factors, Ltd., City Mill Co., Ltd., Hawaii Builders Supply Co., Ltd., Island Lumber Co., Ltd., Lewers & Cooke, Ltd., Mid Pac Lumber Co., Ltd.

Honolulu Lumber Co. v. Am. Factors, Ltd., 403 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 31, 1968
Docket
No. 21737_1
Citations
403 F.2d 49

Opinion

403 F.2d 49

HONOLULU LUMBER CO., Ltd., Appellant, v. AMERICAN FACTORS, LTD., City Mill Co., Ltd., Hawaii Builders Supply Co., Ltd., Island Lumber Co., Ltd., Lewers & Cooke, Ltd., Mid Pac Lumber Co., Ltd., et al., Appellees.

No. 21737.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

April 18, 1968.

Rehearing Denied En Banc July 31, 1968.

Arthur Tibbits, San Francisco, Cal.; and Hiroshi Sakai, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.

Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades; Leslie W. S. Lum, Ralph T. Yamaguchi, George L. T. Kerr and Daniel H. Case, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellees.

ORDER

Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This anti-trust suit was dismissed for want of prosecution in the district court. On motion, the court refused to vacate its dismissal. The plaintiff appeals.

2

We find the actions taken by the district court to have been well within its discretion. The orders appealed from are affirmed.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING 3

The petition for a rehearing en banc and the suggestion of a rehearing en banc is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2015: 120152026peak 2015 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Vasquez v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n77 F. Supp. 3d 911 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

Most recent

  1. Vasquez v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n77 F. Supp. 3d 911 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list