TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Perry E. Rearden v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison

Perry E. REARDEN, Appellant, v. Lamont SMITH, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Appellee

Rearden v. Lamont Smith,, Ga. State Prison, 403 F.2d 773 (5th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 14, 1968
Docket
No. 26183_1
Judges
Aldrich, Godbold, Dyer
Citations
403 F.2d 7731968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4898

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus to Perry Eugene Rearden, who is serving a life sentence for murder, in a Georgia state prison.

To exhaust his state post-conviction remedies, Rearden filed a petition for habeas corpus in the City Court of Reidsville, Georgia, which denied relief. The appellant has alleged that he was unable to appeal from this judgment, due to his indigency.

Effective July 1, 1967, several months prior to the date on which the appellant’s Federal habeas petition was finally adjudicated, the State of Georgia enacted its new Habeas Corpus Act, Georgia Code § 50-127. The statute provides that the exclusive post-conviction remedy for a state convict, beyond the direct appeal, is by petition for habeas corpus filed in the state superior court of the county where the applicant is being detained. The statute also expands the scope of grounds upon which the writ can be granted. See Peters v. Rutledge, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 731 [June 6, 1965], and cases there cited; State of Texas v. Payton, 5 Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d *774 216. The appellant has not sought to avail himself of this remedy.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reason that the appellant has failed to exhaust his available state remedies.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 319692026peak 1969 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Dean Rene Peters v. Rutledge, 397 F.2d 731 (5th Cir. 1968) 74

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list