TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Edward Morgan MacKenna v. Harry S. Avery, Commissioner of Correction and Chairman of Board of Pardons and Paroles

Edward Morgan MacKENNA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harry S. AVERY, Commissioner of Correction and Chairman of Board of Pardons and Paroles, Respondent-Appellee

MacKenna v. Avery, 404 F.2d 71 (6th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 6, 1968
Docket
No. 18989
Judges
Weick, O'Sullivan, Phillips
Citations
404 F.2d 711968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4580

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of automobile theft and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment in the Criminal Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, on December 15, 1966. He is presently confined in the Tennessee State Penitentiary at Nashville.

Appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court, in which he complained of the action of the Tennessee Parole Board on May 28, 1968, in denying him parole. He asserted that he was eligible for parole and was entitled to be paroled, but that the Parole Board did not take into account the factors provided by Tennessee law and arbitrarily and capriciously denied him parole. Apparently the Board did take into account appellant’s past criminal record. He alleged that he was deprived of his liberty without due process of law. The District Judge denied the writ, and appellant appealed.

We affirmed the denial of a prior petition for habeas corpus on November 20, 1967 (case number 18,140).

Federal Courts do not have jurisdiction to review the action of a state parole board in denying or revoking parole of a state prisoner. We find no violation of his rights under the Federal Constitution by the state’s requiring bim to serve a valid sentence. Rose v. Haskins, 388 F.2d 91 (6th Cir., 1968).

Appellee’s motion to affirm is granted. Rule 8, Sixth Circuit.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 11994: 119702026peak 1970 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Frank Paul Riley v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent, Marion Correctional Institution422 F.2d 397 (6th Cir. 1970)
  2. Rowland v. Bradley899 S.W.2d 614 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Rowland v. Bradley899 S.W.2d 614 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994)
  2. Frank Paul Riley v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent, Marion Correctional Institution422 F.2d 397 (6th Cir. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Rose v. E. B. Haskins, 388 F.2d 91 (6th Cir. 1968) 78

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list