TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Raymond Leroy Mitchell v. United States

Raymond Leroy MITCHELL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Mitchell v. United States, 404 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 5, 1968
Docket
No. 25831
Judges
Tuttle, Ainsworth, Mitchell
Citations
404 F.2d 6091968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4596

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312 , and urges as grounds for reversal that the actual number of the license plate on the stolen vehicle was different from that furnished to him by the government in its bill of particulars. At the close of the government’s case, the trial judge granted leave to amend the bill of particulars to conform to the evidence.

*610 It is well settled that whether or not a bill of particulars should be amended is in the discretion of the trial court and will only be reversed upon a clear abuse of discretion. United States v. Bender, 218 F.2d 869, 874 (CA 7-1955).

Appellant has failed to show any abuse of discretion upon the part of the trial court and, further, has failed to demonstrate any prejudice.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1973: 11974: 22006: 119732026peak 1974 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Harry William Theriault474 F.2d 359 (5th Cir. 1973)
  2. United States v. Perez489 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1974)
  3. United States v. Pedro Perez, No. 73-2770 Summary Calendar489 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1974)
  4. State of Tennessee v. Bradley NobleNo. E2005-00011-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 10, 2006)

Most recent

  1. State of Tennessee v. Bradley NobleNo. E2005-00011-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Feb. 10, 2006)
  2. United States v. Pedro Perez, No. 73-2770 Summary Calendar489 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1974)
  3. United States v. Perez489 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1974)
  4. United States v. Harry William Theriault474 F.2d 359 (5th Cir. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Bender, 218 F.2d 869 (7th Cir. 1955) 98

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list