TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

David R. Robson v. United States of America and Paul J. Gernert, Chairman, Pennsylvania State Board of Probation and Parole

David R. ROBSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and Paul J. Gernert, Chairman, Pennsylvania State Board of Probation and Parole

Robson v. United States & Paul J. Gernert, Chairman, Pa. State Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 404 F.2d 885 (3d Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 18, 1968
Docket
No. 17280_1
Judges
Hastie, Kalodner, Per Curiam, Van Dusen
Citations
404 F.2d 8851968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4439

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM.

This case is before the court on appeal from a February 13, 1968, order of the District Court, 279 F.Supp. 631 , denying a 1967 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, or for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis Motion seeking to attack a 1954 court martial conviction 1

on the ground that it was based on evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure. Appellant was serving in 1967 a March 16, 1964, sentence imposed by a Pennsylvania court, which sentence recited that it was imposed “in view of his prior record.” Counsel conceded during the argument that the March 16, 1964, sentence was vacated by the state court in March 1968 and a new sentence of probation was imposed.

In view of this concession, the February 13, 1968, District Court order will be vacated and the case will be remanded with directions that this action be dismissed as moot, without prejudice to any rights appellant may have to challenge the March 1968 sentence or the 1954 courtmartial conviction.

1

. The lengthy brief filed with the District Court (Document 12 in C.A. 43,659) stated that the jurisdictional questions raised (p. 3) were the right of appellant to a writ of habeas corpus or, alternatively, to coram nobis.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 119692026peak 1969 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Coles302 F. Supp. 99 (D. Me. 1969)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Coles302 F. Supp. 99 (D. Me. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Robson v. United States, 279 F. Supp. 631 (E.D. Pa. 1968) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list