TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dewey Deel v. Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Dewey DEEL, Appellant, v. Wilbur J. COHEN, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee

Deel v. Cohen, 404 F.2d 1383 (4th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 26, 1968
Docket
No. 12746
Judges
Boreman, Bryan, Craven, Per Curiam
Citations
404 F.2d 13831968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4357

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The application of Dewey Deel to be granted a period of disability and disability benefits under Sections 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416 (i) and 423, was denied by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. He found that Deel’s proof did not establish disability within the meaning of those sections. Failing in his later suit in the District Court against the Secretary, pursuant to Section 205 (g), 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), to obtain these privileges and benefits, the claimant appeals. We, too, must decline his request.

The District Judge’s opinion fully states the claim and its environmental circumstances, with specific fact findings and conclusions of law. It demonstrates that substantial evidence was not wanting for the Secretary’s decision. We join in these findings, and for the reasons set forth in the opinion, we now affirm the judgment of the District Court. Deel v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 288 F.Supp. 105 (W.D.Va.1968).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 219702026peak 1970 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hendrix v. Finch310 F. Supp. 513 (D.S.C. 1970)
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jan Power, Inc.421 F.2d 1058 (9th Cir. 1970)

Most recent

  1. Hendrix v. Finch310 F. Supp. 513 (D.S.C. 1970)
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jan Power, Inc.421 F.2d 1058 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Deel v. Gardner, 288 F. Supp. 105 (W.D. Va. 1968) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list