Carson Carlton Picklesimer v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison
Carson Carlton PICKLESIMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lamont SMITH, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The record shows that the appellant has not exhausted his state remedies under the new Habeas Corpus Act, Georgia Code § 50-127, 1
in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Therefore the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Peters v. Rutledge, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 731 ; Henderson v. Dutton, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 375 ; Rearden v. Smith, 5 Cir. 1968, 403 F.2d 723 [November 14, 1968].
Affirmed.
1
. This remedy was not available when the original habeas petition was filed March 2, 1967. The effective date of the Act was July 1, 1967, so that the remedy was available long before the District Court denied the petition.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.