TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LEVINSON’S OWL REXALL DRUGS, INC., Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Levinson's Owl Rexall Drugs, Inc., 405 F.2d 494 (9th Cir. 1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 4, 1968
Docket
No. 22259_1
Judges
Merrill, Browning, Hufstedler
Citations
405 F.2d 49469 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 29351968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4633

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The NLRB seeks enforcement of its order entered respecting respondent as reported at 161 N.L.R.B. No. 138.

While the Board might well have gone the other way (as the hearing examiner did), we find substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s finding that respondent violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a) (3) and (1), by diseriminatorily discharging employee Beverly Marsh to discourage union membership and activity.

Accordingly the Board’s order is entitled to enforcement. It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 11976: 119692026peak 1969 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list