TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jean Cobb Krum v. Richard D. Sheppard and Gordon P. Hurley, Jointly and Severally

Jean Cobb KRUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard D. SHEPPARD and Gordon P. Hurley, Jointly and Severally, Defendants-Appellees

Krum v. Sheppard, 407 F.2d 490 (6th Cir. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 3, 1967
Docket
No. 17389_1
Judges
Weick, Peck, Combs
Citations
407 F.2d 4901967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4633

Opinion

ORDER The occurrence out of which this and its predecessor criminal and civil actions arose appear in detail in People v. Krum, 374 Mich. 356 , 132 N.W.2d 69 (1965) and are summarized in the opinion of the District Court from which this appeal was perfected (Krum v. Sheppard, 255 F.Supp. 994 (1966)). Therefore suffice it to here only state that following an altercation with Michigan state police officers (the defendants-appellees), plaintiff-appellant was charged, tried and convicted of interfering with an officer in the performance of his duties. That conviction was sustained in People v. Krum, supra.

Plaintiff-appellant thereafter brought action against these defendants in the Circuit Court for the County of Mackinac, Michigan, for damages for false arrest, illegal search and malicious prosecution. No appeal was taken from the order dismissing that action.

Subsequently the present action was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division. Although alleging the same occurrence alleged in the civil action in the state Circuit Court, the District Court action was bottomed upon appellant’s deprivation of civil rights by appellees in violation of 42, U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. Appeal to this court followed dismissal by the District Court.

District Judge Noel P. Fox sustained a motion of the defendants to dismiss on the ground that the Michigan Statute of Limitations is a bar to this action. We are in accord with this conclusion, and it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed for the reasons set forth in Judge Fox’s opinion (Krum v. Sheppard, supra).

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1969: 11970: 11971: 11972: 11973: 31974: 11976: 21980: 11982: 21983: 11984: 21998: 12019: 119692026peak 1973 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
People v. Krum, 132 N.W.2d 69 (Mich. 1965) 57
Krum v. Sheppard, 255 F. Supp. 994 (W.D. Mich. 1966) 26

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list