Michael J. Riley v. B. J. Rhay
Michael J. RILEY, Appellant, v. B. J. RHAY Et Al., Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, an inmate of Washington State Penitentiary, brought this action under the Civil Rights Act ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 , 1983, 1985), alleging that he suffered from histoplasmosis (a form of tuberculosis) and that the refusal of appellees, who are prison officials, to treat his condition violated his constitutional rights. The district court dismissed the *497 complaint without ordering service of process or holding a hearing. It rested its action upon the ground that the prison physician has “complete professional autonomy” in treating his patients.
While it is true that prison medical officials have wide discretion in treating prisoners (Snow v. Gladden, 338 F.2d 999, 1001 (9th Cir. 1964), it is also well recognized that the failure or refusal to provide medical care may violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Stiltner v. Rhay, 371 F.2d 420 , 421 n. 3 (9th Cir. 1967), and authorities cited. Under this rule, the complaint was not insufficient on its face and should not have been dismissed without issuing process and hearing the parties. Harmon v. Superior Court, 307 F.2d 796 , 798 (9th Cir. 1962). The procedural rights of a prisoner in a case such as this are detailed in Armstrong v. Rushing, 352 F.2d 836, 837 (9th Cir. 1965).
Reversed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(claim by inmate of Washington State Penitentiary that failure to provide medical care violated his constitutional rights states cause of action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985)
-
(“While it is true that prison medical officials have wide discretion in treating prisoners, it is also well recognized that the failure or refusal to provide medical care may violate the Fourteenth Amendment.”)
Cited by 19 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Estelle v. Gamble
- Ochoa v. Superior Court
- Clarence Eugene Jones AKA Asmar Habeeb-Ullah Saleem v. Dr. Johnson, Etc.
- N. H. Newman v. State of Alabama and Bill Baxley, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, United States of America, Amicus Curiae
- Hayes Williams and Arthur Mitchell v. David C. Treen, Governor of the State of Louisiana
- Antoine J. Mayfield, Jr. v. Walter E. Craven, Warden
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.