TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Leroy Stewart v. Vesta Minnick, Official Court Reporter

Leroy STEWART, Appellant, v. Vesta MINNICK, Official Court Reporter, Et Al., Appellees

Stewart v. Vesta Minnick, Official Court Reporter, 409 F.2d 826 (9th Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 6, 1969
Docket
No. 22942_1
Judges
Barnes, Carter, Hupstedler, Per Curiam
Citations
409 F.2d 8261969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13375

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the District Court’s order dismissing appellant’s civil rights complaint ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ).

Appellant sued the State of California, a court reporter, and a court clerk, complaining that the appellees refused to furnish him with that portion of his state criminal trial transcript containing the prosecutor’s closing argument to the jury.

The State is not amenable to suit under the civil rights statute (Williford v. People of California (9th Cir. 1965) 352 F.2d 474 ); the acts charged to the individual appellees were acts performed in their capacity as quasi-judicial officers and they are clothed with judicial immunity (Cf. Peckham v. Scanlon (7th Cir. 1957) 241 F.2d 761 ); and the action was barred by res judicata in that appellant’s prior civil rights complaint including the same grievance was dismissed and this court denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis on the ground that the appeal was frivolous. (Sarelas v. Sheehan (7th Cir. 1965) 353 F.2d 5 ).

The order is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 35 cases

View all citing references →
1970: 21971: 11972: 11973: 11974: 21976: 11977: 11978: 41979: 21980: 41981: 11983: 11985: 11987: 11989: 21991: 11992: 21995: 11996: 12021: 12022: 12024: 12025: 219702026peak 1978 · 4

Most recent

  1. McNeil v. Van HoutenNo. 3:25-cv-00725 (N.D.N.Y. July 22, 2025)
  2. Saintal-Bowman v. 8th Judicial District CourtNo. 2:25-cv-01243 (D. Nev. July 14, 2025)
  3. Bailey v. Oregon Supreme CourtNo. 3:24-cv-01113 (D. Or. July 16, 2024)
  4. Sanders v. JD Home RentalsNo. 1:22-cv-00251 (E.D. Cal. June 8, 2022)
  5. Calhoun v. Pierce CountyNo. 3:20-cv-05788 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 20, 2021)
  6. Samuel v. Michaud980 F. Supp. 1381 (D. Idaho 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Peckham v. M. P. Scanlon, 241 F.2d 761 (7th Cir. 1957) 41
Sarelas v. Sheehan, 353 F.2d 5 (7th Cir. 1965) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list