TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Benjamin Franklin Hankins

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin Franklin HANKINS, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Hankins, 410 F.2d 753 (5th Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 2, 1969
Docket
No. 26362_1
Judges
Brown, Godbold, Cabot
Citations
410 F.2d 7531969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12545

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The record demonstrates that appellant adequately preserved an exception to the court’s failure to give a requested instruction on insanity. Oral argument demonstrated that the case must be reversed and remanded for retrial under Blake v. United States, 5 Cir. (en banc) 1969, 407 F.2d 908 and it was so ordered from the bench.

Reversed and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 21970: 119692026peak 1969 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stiles R. Davis v. United States413 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1969)
  2. United States v. Tsoi Kwan Sang416 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1969)
  3. United States v. Johnny Ray Smith423 F.2d 1357 (5th Cir. 1970)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Johnny Ray Smith423 F.2d 1357 (5th Cir. 1970)
  2. United States v. Tsoi Kwan Sang416 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1969)
  3. Stiles R. Davis v. United States413 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Blake v. United States, 407 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1969) 145

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list