TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Clarence A. Meter, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, Region 18

CHICKASHA MOBILE HOMES, INC., Et Al., Appellees, v. Clarence A. METER, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, Region 18, Appellant

Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Meter, 410 F.2d 758 (8th Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 8, 1969
Docket
No. 19667_1
Judges
Van Oosterhout Heaney
Citations
410 F.2d 75871 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 22081969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12487

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The appellant requests this Court to summarily reverse the order of the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota pursuant to Rule 2, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The District Court temporarily enjoined the National Labor Relations Board from conducting a representation election among the appellees’ employees. It did so because it felt there was a substantial question as to the validity of the order of the Regional Director of the Board requiring the appellees to furnish a preelection list of employees to the Union. See, Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 , 79 S.Ct. 180 , 3 L.Ed.2d 210 (1958). The order was issued in accordance with the Excelsior rule first enunciated in Excelsior Underwear, Inc., 156 NLRB 1236 (1966).

At the time the restraining order was issued, there was a disagreement among the United States Courts of Appeals as to the validity of the Excelsior rule. Since this matter has been appealed to this Court, the Supreme Court, in a divided opinion, in National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759 , 89 S.Ct. 1426 , 22 L.Ed.2d 709 , April 23, 1969, reversed the only Court of Appeals that had held that the Board was without power to require an employer to 'furnish a pre-election list of employees to a union.

*759 While all of the implications of Wyman are not yet apparent and while we do not attempt now to determine its meaning and scope, it is clear, on the basis of it and Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473 , 84 S.Ct. 894 , 11 L.Ed.2d 849 (1964), that the decision of the District Court must be reversed.

Reversed with directions to the District Court to dissolve the temporary restraining order.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 219702026peak 1970 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184 (1958) 832
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co., 394 U.S. 759 (1969) 692
Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473 (1964) 492

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list