TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Richard Lee Davidson and Walter Vernon Thomas v. Warden J. H. Klinger, California Men's Colony, and Warden A. L. Oliver, Folsom Prison

Richard Lee DAVIDSON and Walter Vernon Thomas, Appellants, v. Warden J. H. KLINGER, California Men’s Colony, and Warden A. L. Oliver, Folsom Prison, Appellees

Davidson v. J. H. Klinger, Cal. Men's Colony, & Warden A. L. Oliver, Folsom Prison, 411 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 9, 1969
Docket
No. 22563_1
Judges
Hamley, Browning, Powell
Citations
411 F.2d 746

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

In this habeas proceeding appellants ask a federal court to set aside their state criminal convictions which are still pending on appeal in a state appellate court.

While the federal constitutional question which they present in this federal habeas proceeding may not be available to them on their state appeal, that appeal may result in reversal on some other ground, thereby mooting the federal question.

Moreover, if the federal question is not available to appellants on the pending state appeal, it may be available to them in state post-conviction proceedings instituted after disposition of that appeal. The fact that appellants’ state post-conviction proceedings, instituted pending the state appeal, resulted in the denial of relief, is not dispositive as to the availability of a state post-conviction remedy after the state appellate court has acted upon the appeal.

Appellants have not exhausted their available state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1964); Christiansen v. O’Con-nor, 9 Cir., 378 F.2d 364 . On this ground, and without prejudice to appellants’ right to raise a constitutional question in a federal court at the proper time, the order denying the application is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 20 cases

View all citing references →
1969: 11970: 11971: 21972: 11974: 31976: 11978: 11983: 11991: 12019: 12020: 42021: 22022: 119692026peak 2020 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Donald O. Coe v. Otis Thurman, Warden922 F.2d 528 (9th Cir. 1991)
  2. Sherwood v. Tomkins716 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1983)
  3. John D. Miller v. Frank Hall536 F.2d 967 (1st Cir. 1976)
  4. Dale Leroy Daniels v. Louis S. Nelson, Warden, Etc.415 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1969)
  5. Bradley v. JUDGES OF SUPERIOR CT. FOR CTY. OF LOS ANGELES372 F. Supp. 26 (C.D. Cal. 1974)
  6. David Piercy v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden579 F.2d 470 (8th Cir. 1978)

Most recent

  1. Akinbayode v. State of NevadaNo. 3:22-cv-00403 (D. Nev. Oct. 12, 2022)
  2. Gilmore v. Reno Justice CourtNo. 3:20-cv-00089 (D. Nev. Feb. 18, 2021)
  3. Bradford v. JohnsonNo. 2:21-cv-00025 (D. Nev. Jan. 8, 2021)
  4. (HC) Jones v. HillNo. 2:20-cv-01507 (E.D. Cal. July 31, 2020)
  5. Johnson v. LombardoNo. 2:20-cv-00854 (D. Nev. June 24, 2020)
  6. Rider v. Esmeralda County SheriffNo. 2:17-cv-02822 (D. Nev. May 13, 2020)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Christiansen v. O'connor, 378 F.2d 364 (9th Cir. 1967) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list