United States v. Pedro Gonzalez-Carrillo
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro GONZALEZ-CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The opinion heretofore filed in this case is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place:
Appellant was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. § 176a. He drove a car across the border from Mexico into the United States. There were 110 bricks of marihuana concealed in the car. Appellant claimed that he did not know that the marihuana was there, and on appeal argues that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding that he did know. We hold that the evidence is sufficient. Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 378 F.2d 256, 259 ; Aguilar v. United States, 9 Cir., 1966, 363 F.2d 379 .
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.