TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Keith P. Ayers v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director, United States Medical Center for Federalprisoners, Springfield, Missouri

Keith P. AYERS, Appellant, v. Dr. P. J. CICCONE, Director, United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, Missouri, Appellee

Ayers v. P. J. Ciccone, Dir., United States Med. Ctr. for Federalprisoners, Springfield, Mo., 413 F.2d 1049 (8th Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 30, 1969
Docket
No. 19538
Judges
Matthes, Gibson, Bright
Citations
413 F.2d 10491969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11687

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a federal prisoner confined in the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, Mo., filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on March 29, 1968. He alleged in substance that he was being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment in that he was not being provided adequate medical attention for chronic osteomyelitis of the right foot and left leg from which he had been suffering for a number of years.

Chief Judge Becker, after full consideration of appellant’s claims and the response to order to show cause filed by Dr. Ciccone, the Director of the Medical Center, found that appellant was not entitled to habeas relief and dismissed the petition without prejudice. This appeal is from that order.

We are satisfied from our review of the record and the controlling authorities that Judge Becker reached the proper conclusion. We therefore affirm on the basis of his soundly reasoned memorandum opinion reported at 300 F.Supp. 568 (W.D.Mo., October, 1968).

*1050 Subsequent to the submission of this appeal on May 16, 1969, appellant has informed us by letter that he is again being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment in that the prison authorities are refusing to furnish him adequate medical treatment. Appellant also informs us that on May 23, 1969, he filed another habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court.

We treat appellant’s letter as a petition for relief from this court and deny it because of the pendency of the petition above referred to in the district court. We are confident that Judge Becker will give prompt attention to appellant’s pending petition, will fully explore the matters complained of and will enter an appropriate judgment.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 21971: 11975: 119702026peak 1970 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ayers v. Ciccone, 300 F. Supp. 568 (W.D. Mo. 1968) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list