TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Michael Eugene Horton

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael Eugene HORTON, Appellant

United States v. Horton, 416 F.2d 1052 (4th Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 14, 1969
Docket
No. 13439
Judges
Sobeloff, Craven, Butzner
Citations
416 F.2d 1052

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The appellant’s conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm, 18 U.S.C. § 113 , rests in part upon his statement made to the police after he was duly warned of his constitutional rights. He challenges the admission of his statement made under Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 , 83 S.Ct. 407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963), but we think the defendant fails to bring himself within the rule of that case. United States v. Close, 349 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1965).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963) 10,714
United States v. Close, 349 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1965) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list