TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Arthur L. Liman, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection and Indemnity Association, Inc.

Liman v. Am. S.S. Owners Mut. Prot. & Indem. Ass'n, 417 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 24, 1969
Docket
No. 33605
Citations
417 F.2d 6271969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10303

Opinion

417 F.2d 627

Arthur L. LIMAN, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of A. H. Bull Steamship Co., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP OWNERS MUTUAL PROTECTION AND INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 156, Docket 33605.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 15, 1969. Decided Oct. 24, 1969.

Ambrose Doskow, New York City, (Rosenman, Colin, Kaye, Pteschek, Freund & Emil, Peter F. Nadel, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Louis J. Gusmano, New York City, (Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The issue on this appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York is whether the court properly granted a declaratory judgment that the indemnity insurer of A. H. Bull Steamship Company, now in bankruptcy in that court, is obligated to indemnify the Trustee for the payment of personal injury claims within the scope of the policies. These contain a $1,000 deductible and the Trustee has arranged that upon his payment of a judgment against the estate the claimant will repay $1,000 and become a general creditor for that amount. The insurer argues that all the insured is paying is the net amount plus its expenses and that it is entitled to deduct $1,000 from that sum rather than from the gross recovery and expenses. Judge Mansfield, in a well-considered opinion, 299 F.Supp. 106 , held the contrary. We agree and can find nothing to add.

2

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 11981: 11990: 11992: 119782026peak 1978 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list