TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Randolph Erwin Rosenson

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randolph Erwin ROSENSON, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Rosenson, 417 F.2d 629 (5th Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 18, 1969
Docket
No. 26976_1
Judges
Brown, Jones, Carswell
Citations
417 F.2d 629
Cited by 8 Original from court

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Erwin Rosenson was convicted of an unlawful departure from the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1407 . The circumstances giving rise to his conviction and the contentions made by him in the district court and in this Court on appeal are set forth in the opinions of the district court, Rosenson v. United States of America, 291 F.Supp. 867 , and Rosenson v. United States of America, 291 F.Supp. 874 . No prejudicial error is disclosed by the record before us on appeal. The judgment and sentence of the district court is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →
1970: 11972: 11975: 21977: 11990: 11992: 12007: 119702026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mizrahi v. Gonzales492 F.3d 156 (2d Cir. 2007)
  2. Bronsztejn v. Immigration & Naturalization Service526 F.2d 1290 (2d Cir. 1975)
  3. HOU20 I. & N. Dec. 513 (BIA 1992)
  4. United States v. Everett Carlson561 F.2d 105 (1st Cir. 1977)
  5. BRONSZTEJN15 I. & N. Dec. 281 (BIA 1975)
  6. State v. Mobley568 So. 2d 1368 (La. Ct. App. 1990)

Most recent

  1. Mizrahi v. Gonzales492 F.3d 156 (2d Cir. 2007)
  2. HOU20 I. & N. Dec. 513 (BIA 1992)
  3. State v. Mobley568 So. 2d 1368 (La. Ct. App. 1990)
  4. United States v. Everett Carlson561 F.2d 105 (1st Cir. 1977)
  5. Bronsztejn v. Immigration & Naturalization Service526 F.2d 1290 (2d Cir. 1975)
  6. BRONSZTEJN15 I. & N. Dec. 281 (BIA 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Rosenson, 291 F. Supp. 874 (E.D. La. 1968) 12
United States v. Rosenson, 291 F. Supp. 867 (E.D. La. 1968) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list