TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Auther Larnce King and James Albert King

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anther Larnce KING and James Albert King, Defendants-Appellants

United States v. Auther Larnce King & James Albert King, 417 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 29, 1969
Docket
No. 27167
Judges
Brown, Jones, Carswell
Citations
417 F.2d 633

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The appellants appeal from a sentence of the district court following their conviction for engaging in moonshine activities. Their contentions on appeal cannot be sustained. The judgment and sentence of the district court must be and it is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list