TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Company, Etc. v. National Blasting Company, Inc. -Fourth Party United Bonding Insurance Company, Etc. -Fourth Party v. First National Bank of Venice, Fourth Party

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Company, Etc., Defendants-Third-Party v. National Blasting Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party United Bonding Insurance Company, Etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party v. First National Bank of Venice, Fourth Party

United States of Am., for the Use & Benefit of Lee A. Tharpe v. Norfold Dredging Co., Etc. v. Nat'l Blasting Co., Inc. -Fourth Party United Bonding Ins. Co., Etc. -Fourth Party v. First Nat'l Bank of Venice, Fourth Party, 417 F.2d 634 (1st Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 29, 1969
Docket
No. 27158_1
Citations
417 F.2d 634

Opinion

417 F.2d 634

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lee A. THARPE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORFOLD DREDGING COMPANY, etc., et al., Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NATIONAL BLASTING COMPANY, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Fourth Party Plaintiff. UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VENICE, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 27158.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1969, Rehearing Denied Dec. 29, 1969.

D. Lloyd Zook, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

W. Robert Mann, Bradenton, Fla., David A. Rhodes, Palmetto, Fla., L. Howard Payne, Venice, Fla., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

For the reasons stated in the trial judge's Consolidated Final Judgment and in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list