TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bowman & Bourdon, Inc. v. Robert E. Rohr

BOWMAN & BOURDON, INC., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Robert E. ROHR Et Al., Defendants, Appellants

Bowman & Bourdon, Inc. v. Rohr, 417 F.2d 780 (1st Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 28, 1969
Docket
No. 7347
Judges
Aldrich, McEntee, Coffin
Citations
417 F.2d 7801969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10263

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are set out in the district court’s opinion. Bowman & Bourdon, Inc. v. Rohr, 296 F.Supp. 847 (D.Mass.1969). We have reviewed the evidence. The court’s findings are warranted and we see no error of law.

We believe, in particular, that the court was warranted in finding that Bowman was misled. The failure to disclose the inventory unit cost changes involved here meets the test of materiality set forth in Rogen v. Ilikon Corp., 361 F.2d 260 (1st Cir. 1967). Furthermore, rescission is an appropriate remedy in this case. 3 Loss, Securities Regulation 1793-1794 (1961);

see Mott v. Tri-Con-tinental Financial Co., 330 F.2d 468, 471 (2d Cir. 1964); Kardon v. National Gypsum Co., 69 F.Supp. 512, 514 (E.D.Pa. 1946).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 11973: 21977: 31985: 119722026peak 1977 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,069 Republic Technology Fund, Inc. v. The Lionel Corporation v483 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1973)
  2. Holmes v. Bateson434 F. Supp. 1365 (D.R.I. 1977)
  3. Terry James and Juha Kokko v. Raymond H. Meinke778 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1985)
  4. Stewart v. Bennett359 F. Supp. 878 (D. Mass. 1973)
  5. Republic Technology Fund, Inc. v. Lionel Corporation345 F. Supp. 656 (S.D.N.Y. 1972)
  6. United States Steel & Carnegie Pension Fund, Inc. v. Orenstein557 F.2d 343 (2d Cir. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Kardon v. Nat'l Gypsum Co., 69 F. Supp. 512 (E.D. Pa. 1946) 190
Rogen v. Ilikon Corp., 361 F.2d 260 (1st Cir. 1966) 102
Mott v. Tri-Cont'l Fin. Corp., 330 F.2d 468 (2d Cir. 1964) 15
Bowman & Bourdon, Inc. v. Rohr, 296 F. Supp. 847 (D. Mass. 1969) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list