Farrell Lines Incorporated, Libellant- v. Titan Industrial Corporation
Opinion
419 F.2d 835
FARRELL LINES INCORPORATED, Libellant-Appellant, v. TITAN INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 308, Docket 33702.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 9, 1969. Decided Dec. 16, 1969.
George W. Sullivan, New York City (Francis R. Matera, Lilly, Sullivan & Purcell, New York City, on the brief), for libellant-appellant.
John S. Rogers, New York City (Burlingham, Underwood, Wright, White & Lord, New York City), for respondent-appellee.
Before MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges, and RYAN, 1 District judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed on the opinion of Judge MacMahon, reported at 306 F.Supp. 1348 (S.D.N.Y.1969).
1
Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.
- Thunderbird Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Penn-Dixie Steel Corp. (In re Penn-Dixie Steel Corp.)
- Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 Aktieselskab v. Black & Geddes, Inc. (In re Black & Geddes, Inc.)
- LTV Steel Co. v. David Graham Co. (In re Chateaugay Corp.)
- Jackson Rapid Delivery Service, Inc. v. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.
- Compania Sud Americana De Vapores v. Atlantic Caribbean Shipping Co.
Most recent
- GIC Services, LLC v. Freightplus (USA), Inc.
- Jackson Rapid Delivery Service, Inc. v. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc.
- LTV Steel Co. v. David Graham Co. (In re Chateaugay Corp.)
- Compania Sud Americana De Vapores v. Atlantic Caribbean Shipping Co.
- Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 Aktieselskab v. Black & Geddes, Inc. (In re Black & Geddes, Inc.)
- Naviera Neptuno S.A. v. All International Freight Forwarders, Inc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.