TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Space Conditioning, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. Insurance Company of America

SPACE CONDITIONING, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant

Space Conditioning, Inc. v. Ins. Co. of Am., 419 F.2d 836 (6th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 13, 1970
Docket
No. 19530_1
Judges
Phillips, Edwards, McCree
Citations
419 F.2d 836

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Insurance Company of America, (INA) appeals from a judgment against it entered in .the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in favor of its insured, Space Conditioning, Inc. Space Conditioning brought this suit under diversity jurisdiction, claiming that INA had violated its insurance contract by refusing to defend or pay the damages assessed in a suit by a third party against Space Conditioning.

The third party, High Life Inn, sued Space Conditioning for damages to persons, property and business allegedly due to faulty air conditioning equipment which Space Conditioning installed. High Life secured a jury award of $80,-000 in Saginaw County Circuit Court. Space Conditioning paid $70,000 in satisfaction of .the judgment, plus $12,046.-47 in legal expenses incurred in defending the suit.

The District Judge in a well-reasoned opinion held 1) that the High Life Inn action was in major part an action for “accidental” injury within the meaning of Space Conditioning’s policy with INA, Guerdon Industries, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 371 Mich. 12 , 123 N.W.2d 143 (1963); 2) that INA had a duty to defend its insured which it breached at its peril, Ripepi v. American Insurance Companies, 349 F.2d 300 (3d Cir. 1965); 3) that the breach of INA’s duty to defend precluded its raising as a defense to this suit the fact that one item of damage claimed by High Life Inn was excluded from INA’s coverage, American Indemnity Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 195 F.2d 353 (6th Cir. 1952); Sims v. Illinois National Casualty Co., 43 Ill.App. 2d 184, 193 N.E.2d 123 (1963). See also St. Louis Dressed Beef Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 201 U.S. 173 , 26 S.Ct. 400 , 50 L.Ed. 712 (1906); New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Jones, 135 F.2d 191 (6th Cir. 1943); Annot., 49 A.L.R.2d 711 -17 (1956).

High Life Inn had claimed total damages of $205,033.66. The exclusion cited by INA arguably applied to $48,533.66 of this sum. As we have noted, the jury awarded $80,000 and was not asked to and did not indicate how it allocated damages. The District Judge declined to seek to divine jury intent from this record. We conclude that he was right.

The judgment of .the District Court is affirmed on the opinion of the District Judge. Space Conditioning, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America, 294 F.Supp. 1290 (E.D.Mich.1968).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 21974: 11975: 11977: 11982: 11983: 11984: 11985: 119702026peak 1970 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Md. Cas. Co., 201 U.S. 173 (1906) 137
Guerdon Indus. v. Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y., 123 N.W.2d 143 (Mich. 1963) 71
Sims ex rel. Ruark v. Ill. Nat'l Cas. Co., 193 N.E.2d 123 (Ill. App. Ct. 1963) 121
Ripepi v. The Am. Ins. Companies, 349 F.2d 300 (3d Cir. 1965) 23
New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Jones, 135 F.2d 191 (6th Cir. 1943) 23
Space Conditioning, Inc. v. Ins. Co. of No. Amer., 294 F. Supp. 1290 (E.D. Mich. 1968) 22
Am. Indem. Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co, 195 F.2d 353 (6th Cir. 1952) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list