TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re United States Overseas Airlines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Bankrupt. United States Overseas Airlines, Inc., Bankrupt

In the Matter of UNITED STATES OVERSEAS AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Bankrupt. United States Overseas Airlines, Inc., Bankrupt, Appellant

In re United States Overseas Airlines, Inc., a Del. Corp., Bankrupt. United States Overseas Airlines, Inc., Bankrupt, 419 F.2d 932 (3d Cir. 1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 19, 1969
Docket
No. 18025
Judges
Hastie, Van Dusen Adams
Citations
419 F.2d 9321969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9613

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by a bankrupt corporation from an order of the district court confirming an order in which the referee had confirmed the sale of the bankrupt’s corporate trade name and the bankrupt’s revoked certificate to operate as a supplemental air carrier to a purchaser for $5,000.

It is not contended that the sale price was inadequate. All of the tangible assets of the bankrupt had been sold before the presently challenged sale.

In dismissing the bankrupt’s petition for review, the district court reasoned that:

“[u]nder Section 39c of the Bankruptcy Act, only a ‘person aggrieved’ can petition for review of a Referee’s order. A ‘Person Aggrieved’ is one who is directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by the order. Hartman Corp. of America v. United States, 304 F.2d 429 (8 Cir. 1962); In re Henry Wood Sons Co., 279 Fed. 608 (D.C. Mass.1922). In any event, real value was realized by the trustee for the benefit of the creditors, and the bankrupt may not petition for review where fair value is exchanged for the asset, if it be one, of only a skeletal charter and a dormant right of purchase. Of course, a grossly inadequate bid is quite another matter. The argument of the petitioner is that the trustee had no assets to sell in this regard. If that is so, then only the purchaser has been harmed by his speculation. If the bankrupt corporation had inherent rights in these intangible property rights, then the trustee’s duty under the Act was to sell, and this is precisely what he did.”

We agree with the district court that the bankrupt was not “aggrieved,” within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Act, by the sale it is attempting to challenge.

The judgment will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1993: 12026: 119932026peak 1993 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Hartman Corp. Of Am. v. United States, 304 F.2d 429 (8th Cir. 1962) 11
In re Henry Wood Sons Co., 279 F. 608 (D. Mass. 1922) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list