TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

George L. Schultz and Margaret F. Schultz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

George L. SCHULTZ and Margaret F. Schultz, Appellants v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Schultz v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 420 F.2d 490 (3d Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 9, 1970
Docket
No. 17764_1
Judges
Kalodner, Staley, Freedman
Citations
420 F.2d 49025 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 3911970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11268

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM.

On this appeal the appellant taxpayers challenge the Tax Court’s Decision that their four year pre-payment of storage charges, insurance premiums and state ad valorem taxes, in conjunction with their non-business purchase of substantial quantities of bulk whiskey, were not deductible as ordinary and necessary expenses under Section 212(2) of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code, but instead should be added to the cost of the whiskey.

The distinction between an ordinary expense and a capital expenditure in this field is based on a factual analysis of the relationship of the expenses to the entire transaction. Although storage charges, insurance premiums, and property taxes are normally deductible as ordinary expenses, they are not deductible where they are incurred as an integal part of a capital transaction. The Tax Court’s determination that the pre-payments here made were incurred as part of a capital transaction is essentially a factual determination.

On review of the record we cannot say that the factual determination made by the Tax Court is “clearly erroneous”, and accordingly its Decision will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1970: 11971: 11972: 21973: 41975: 11982: 41983: 11984: 11985: 119702026peak 1973 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list