TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Edward R. Bacon Company v. William B. Grover, Trustee in Bankruptcy

EDWARD R. BACON COMPANY, Appellant, v. William B. GROVER, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellee

Edward R. Bacon Co. v. Grover, 420 F.2d 678 (9th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 21, 1970
Docket
No. 23013_1
Judges
Barnes, Ely, Huf-Stedler, Per Curiam
Citations
420 F.2d 6781970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11128

Opinion — Per Curiam

*679 PER CURIAM:

Edward R. Bacon Company (“Bacon”) appeals from an order of the District Court affirming a turnover order secured by the trustee in bankruptcy to recover $756.71 received by Bacon sometime between December 8 and December 13, 1966, in discharge of a writ of attachment Bacon had levied on funds of the debtor on October 20, 1966. The debtor filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy on February 2, 1967. We reverse because the essential finding that the debtor was insolvent when the lien attached is clearly erroneous.

The books of the debtor and the balance sheets prepared by the debtor’s certified public accountant established that the assets of the debtor substantially exceeded its liabilities as of September 30, 1966 and November 30, 1966. The accountant testified that the books and the balance sheets accurately reflected the financial condition of the debtor as a going concern. No evidence is in the record to the contrary.

To support the finding of insolvency, the trustee relies upon testimony of the same accountant that book value of some of the assets could not have been realized had the debtor then ceased business, and, if the book value of those assets were accordingly reduced, the liabilities of the debtor would have exceeded its assets. There is “overwhelming authority” that, for the purpose of deciding insolvency in this context, the assets of the debtor must be valued as those of a going concern. (1 Collier Bankruptcy (14th Ed. 1969) j[ 1.19, p. 130.1.) The finding of insolvency thus cannot be sustained.

It is unnecessary to reach the remaining contentions of the parties.

No useful purpose could be served by retrying the issue; the evidence has been fully developed.

We reverse the order of the District Court with directions to vacate the turnover order.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 21981: 11985: 11994: 11996: 119792026peak 1979 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list