United States v. Louis Johnnie B. Reed
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis Johnnie B. REED Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The Court sitting in banc recedes from and overrules the decision of the majority of the panel in this case, 1
for the reasons set forth by Judge Simpson in dissent.
In doing so, we do not consider it necessary to disturb the holding of Hellman v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 339 F.2d 36, 38 , as applied to the facts in that case.
The facts are distinguished from those in this case by Footnote 5 to Judge Simpson’s dissent, 414 F.2d at 443.
One further observation is in order. We deem irrelevant to our decision, and do not associate ourselves with, the recitation of the matters occurring at the time of Reed’s sentence, set forth in the latter portion of Footnote 2 of the dissent, 414 F.2d at 441.
The judgment appealed from is reversed and remanded for further pro- *191 eeedings below. Let our mandate issue immediately.
Reversed and remanded.
COLEMAN, Circuit Judge, respectfully dissents.
1
. United States v. Reed, 5 Cir. 1969, 414 F.2d 435 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Stewart v. State
- Roland Anderson, 115181 v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, Roland Anderson, 115181 v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
- Anthony Bruno v. J. E. Lavallee, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility
- United States v. Jerry Houston Stone
- United States v. Charles Edward Payne
- United States v. Eli Jenkins
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.