Butell Robinson and Donald Robinson v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Edward R
Butell ROBINSON and Donald Robinson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee; Edward R. BREEDLOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The district court concluded in a full opinion that Transcontinental was empowered to condemn a right of way under the applicable Georgia Condemnation statute, Ga.Laws, 1929, p. 219 et seq., Ga.Code Annot. § 36-201.1 (1969 Supp.); Botts v. Southeastern Pipeline Company, 190 Ga. 689, 700 , 10 S.E.2d 375 (1940), although the Federal Power Commission had not issued a certificate of public convenience and necessity under the Natural Gas Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 717f(c). We agree. The Georgia statute is a grant of the state power of eminent domain, separate and distinct from the federal power of eminent domain as granted under the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 717f(h). No such certificate is required under the Georgia statute nor does the Natural Gas Act require such a certificate as a condition precedent to the use of the Georgia statute. Cf. Oakland Club v. South Carolina Public Service Commission, 4 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 84 ; Stitt v. Manufacturers Light and Heat Co., 39 F.P.C. 323 (1968).
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 32 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Rufus Reese
- Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Ronald R. Dunn
- Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Robert G. Ingrum
- Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Rebecca Warren
- Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Nikki Wallace
- Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Michael Rippy
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.