TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Butell Robinson and Donald Robinson v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Edward R

Butell ROBINSON and Donald Robinson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee; Edward R. BREEDLOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

Butell Robinson v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Edward R, 421 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 18, 1970
Docket
No. 28169_1
Judges
Jones, Bell, God-Bold
Citations
421 F.2d 1397

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The district court concluded in a full opinion that Transcontinental was empowered to condemn a right of way under the applicable Georgia Condemnation statute, Ga.Laws, 1929, p. 219 et seq., Ga.Code Annot. § 36-201.1 (1969 Supp.); Botts v. Southeastern Pipeline Company, 190 Ga. 689, 700 , 10 S.E.2d 375 (1940), although the Federal Power Commission had not issued a certificate of public convenience and necessity under the Natural Gas Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 717f(c). We agree. The Georgia statute is a grant of the state power of eminent domain, separate and distinct from the federal power of eminent domain as granted under the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 717f(h). No such certificate is required under the Georgia statute nor does the Natural Gas Act require such a certificate as a condition precedent to the use of the Georgia statute. Cf. Oakland Club v. South Carolina Public Service Commission, 4 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 84 ; Stitt v. Manufacturers Light and Heat Co., 39 F.P.C. 323 (1968).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 32 cases

View all citing references →
1976: 11977: 21980: 11981: 11982: 12006: 2619762026peak 2006 · 26

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit563 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1977)
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres of Land563 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1977)
  3. Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Poland384 So. 2d 528 (La. Ct. App. 1980)
  4. Harmon v. Phillips Petroleum Co.555 F. Supp. 447 (D. Mont. 1982)
  5. Baird v. Sam Houston Electric Cooperative, Inc.627 S.W.2d 734 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981)
  6. Dr. Don M. Smart v. Texas Power and Light Company525 F.2d 1209 (5th Cir. 1976)

Most recent

  1. Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Rufus ReeseNo. M2005-00805-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2006)
  2. Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Ronald R. DunnNo. M2005-00824-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2006)
  3. Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Robert G. IngrumNo. M2005-00827-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2006)
  4. Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Rebecca WarrenNo. M2005-00830-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2006)
  5. Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Nikki WallaceNo. M2005-00819-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2006)
  6. Midwestern Gas Transmission Company v. Michael RippyNo. M2005-00828-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co., 10 S.E.2d 375 (Ga. 1940) 56
Oakland Club v. S.C. Pub. Serv. Auth., 110 F.2d 84 (4th Cir. 1940) 44

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list