TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Alfred Windom v. Thomas Cook, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary

Alfred WINDOM, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Thomas COOK, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant

Windom v. Cook, 423 F.2d 721 (5th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 25, 1970
Docket
No. 28116_1
Judges
Ainsworth, Dyer, Per Curiam, Simpson
Citations
423 F.2d 721

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Windom, a state prisoner, pleaded guilty to charges of burglary and assault with intent to commit rape. He filed a habeas corpus petition in the District Court alleging involuntariness of the plea by virtue of the ineffectiveness of the assistance of his counsel. The District Court granted the writ. We affirm.

Windom’s court appointed counsel testified that his only conference with Windom, which came just prior to the arraignment proceeding at which the guilty plea was entered, lasted for a period of between fifteen and thirty minutes. He did not discuss the elements of the crimes charged with Windom and he did not make an effort to find out the facts of the case either by asking Windom what had happened or by speaking with the alleged victims or the prosecuting attorney.

On this basis alone, the record reflects the ineffectiveness of counsel. “Effective counsel includes familiarity of counsel with the case and an opportunity to investigate it if necessary in order meaningfully to advise the accused of his options.” (Citations omitted) Calloway v. Powell, 5 Cir. 1968, 393 F.2d 886, 888 . Counsel was not in a position to advise Windom prior to allowing him to plead guilty because he was unfamiliar with the case. Furthermore, counsel allowed Windom to plead guilty without advising *722 him of the fact that he could attack the composition of the grand jury which indicted him when everyone, including counsel, knew that Negroes had been systematically excluded therefrom.

The order of the District Court granting the writ of habeas corpus is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1970: 11971: 11972: 11973: 21974: 31976: 11979: 11997: 119702026peak 1974 · 3

Most recent

  1. Jones v. Jones988 F. Supp. 1000 (E.D. La. 1997)
  2. Sidney Ray Wilkerson v. United States591 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1979)
  3. Marion Mason v. Charles Balcom, Superintendent, Montgomery Correctional Institution531 F.2d 717 (5th Cir. 1976)
  4. Albert C. Hora v. State of Louisiana495 F.2d 1248 (5th Cir. 1974)
  5. Wray v. Hopper377 F. Supp. 653 (M.D. Ga. 1974)
  6. Wilbert Herring v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections491 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Calloway v. Powell, 393 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1968) 23

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list