TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. W. M. Webb, Incorporated

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. W. M. WEBB, INCORPORATED, Et Al., Appellees

United States v. W. M. Webb, Inc., 424 F.2d 1070 (5th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 4, 1970
Docket
No. 25674
Judges
Coleman, Morgan, Hunter
Citations
424 F.2d 1070

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

On March 31, 1970, the Supreme Court of the United States rendered its opinion and issued its decree vacating the judgment of this Court and remanded for further proceedings. Taxpayers are the owners of boats used in commercial fishing. The fishing is carried out through contractual arrangements with boat captains who staff the boats and manage their day-to-day operation. The *1071 crucial legal issue is whether the captain and crewmen are the “employees” of the owners within the meaning of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act ( 26 U.S.C.A. § 3101 et seq.) and the Federal Employment Tax Act (26 U.S.C.A. 3301 et seq.) This Court, 402 F.2d 956 , agreed with the district court, 271 F. Supp. 249 , that the statutes’ prescription of “common law rules” barred application of maritime standards in making this determination. Based on that legal premise, we concluded that the decision of the district court that the captains and crewmen were not employees of the taxpayers should be affirmed.

The Supreme Court held that this Court “erred in declining to judge the status of the captains and crewmen against the standards of maritime law.” This holding, coupled with our earlier conclusion that under maritime law the captain is the agent of the owner and the crew hands are employees, leaves no room for further argument as to the appropriate disposition of this case.

Accordingly, the Court.denies the taxpayers’ request for.further proceedings here; the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the taxpayers’ complaints.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 11973: 219712026peak 1973 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. W. M. Webb, Inc., 402 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1968) 9
W. M. Webb, Inc. v. United States, 271 F. Supp. 249 (E.D. La. 1967) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list