TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Airline Maintenance Lodge 702 v. Loudermilk

Airline Maintenance Lodge 702, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Donald L. Loudermilk, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Airline Maint. Lodge 702 v. Loudermilk, 426 F.2d 802 (5th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 2, 1970
Docket
No. 27265_1
Citations
426 F.2d 80274 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 23991970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8956

Opinion

426 F.2d 802

AIRLINE MAINTENANCE LODGE 702, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. Donald L. LOUDERMILK, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

No. 27265.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 2, 1970.

Joseph P. Manners, Richard Gale, Miami, Fla., Plato Papps, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Richard L. Horn, Allan Milledge, Miami, Fla., for appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge and JONES, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Because of the inadequacy of the briefs of both parties growing out of the fact that the issue was not considered adequately by the District Court, the judgment is vacated and remanded for the District Court to consider and then make appropriate findings and conclusions regarding the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court, the propriety and basis for removal from the State Court, the propriety of denial of the motion to remand, and related matters going to Federal Court jurisdiction and removal. A new judgment as appropriate shall then be entered. In calling the Court's attention to these possibly relevant materials, we intimate in no way any prejudgment. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1441 , 1331(a), 1337; International Ass'n of Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc., 1963, 372 U.S. 682 , 83 S.Ct. 956 , 10 L.Ed.2d 67 ; Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 1968, 390 U.S. 557 , 88 S.Ct. 1235 , 20 L.Ed.2d 126 ; Mungin v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F.2d 1169 ; Clinton v. Hueston, 5 Cir., 1962, 308 F.2d 908 .

2

Judgment vacated.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 12024: 119712026peak 1971 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, 390 U.S. 557 (1968) 915
Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists v. Cent. Airlines, Inc., 372 U.S. 682 (1963) 236
Clinton v. Hueston, 308 F.2d 908 (5th Cir. 1962) 13
Nehemiah Mungin v. Fla. East Coast Ry. Co., 416 F.2d 1169 (5th Cir. 1969) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list