Airline Maintenance Lodge 702 v. Loudermilk
Airline Maintenance Lodge 702, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Donald L. Loudermilk, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Opinion
426 F.2d 802
AIRLINE MAINTENANCE LODGE 702, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. Donald L. LOUDERMILK, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
No. 27265.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 2, 1970.
Joseph P. Manners, Richard Gale, Miami, Fla., Plato Papps, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Richard L. Horn, Allan Milledge, Miami, Fla., for appellees.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge and JONES, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Because of the inadequacy of the briefs of both parties growing out of the fact that the issue was not considered adequately by the District Court, the judgment is vacated and remanded for the District Court to consider and then make appropriate findings and conclusions regarding the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court, the propriety and basis for removal from the State Court, the propriety of denial of the motion to remand, and related matters going to Federal Court jurisdiction and removal. A new judgment as appropriate shall then be entered. In calling the Court's attention to these possibly relevant materials, we intimate in no way any prejudgment. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1441 , 1331(a), 1337; International Ass'n of Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc., 1963, 372 U.S. 682 , 83 S.Ct. 956 , 10 L.Ed.2d 67 ; Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 1968, 390 U.S. 557 , 88 S.Ct. 1235 , 20 L.Ed.2d 126 ; Mungin v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 5 Cir., 1969, 416 F.2d 1169 ; Clinton v. Hueston, 5 Cir., 1962, 308 F.2d 908 .
2
Judgment vacated.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.