TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. John L. Battaglia

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John L. BATTAGLIA, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Battaglia, 426 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 25, 1970
Docket
No. 25010
Judges
Duniway, Hufstedler, Per Curiam, Powell
Citations
426 F.2d 8941970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9086

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Battaglia appeals from an order revoking probation. In essence, his argument is that the evidence of his violation of the. terms of his probation is so slight that we should hold that the trial judge abused his discretion. See Whitfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 480, 482 ; Longknife v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 381 F.2d 17, 19 . On this record, we cannot so hold. There is substantial evidence of repeated and' serious violations of the terms of Battaglia’s probation.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Longknife v. United States, 381 F.2d 17 (9th Cir. 1967) 43
Whitfield v. United States, 401 F.2d 480 (9th Cir. 1969) 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list