Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corporation
JENKINS METAL SHOPS, INC., Appellees, v. PNEUMAFIL CORPORATION, Appellant
Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corp., 427 F.2d 144 (4th Cir. 1970)
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant’s patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge’s findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 303 F.Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C.1969), its judgment is Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.