United States of America, and v. Carlos Rosas-Garduno, And
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Carlos ROSAS-GARDUNO, Defendant and Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks reversal of conviction for escape from confinement at Federal Prison Camp, Safford, Arizona, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 751 . He asserts that the proof at trial of the elements of the crime of escape was inadequate.
We reject the assertion for the following reasons:
1. Conviction was established by an exemplified copy of the judgment of conviction (Government Exhibit II).
2. Commitment was established by the original certificate of the Deputy United States Marshal that defendant had been delivered to the prison camp.
3. Defendant’s contention that the Government was required to prove, in addition, that confinement at Safford was by direction of the Attorney General has been rejected in United States v. Jones, 392 F.2d 567 (C.A.4,1968), and we agree.
Conviction affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.