Chartier Real Estate Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Three Cases)
CHARTIER REAL ESTATE COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent, Appellee. (Three Cases)
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The decisions of the Tax Court are affirmed, essentially on its opinion. 52 T.C. 346 (1969). So far as the year 1962 is concerned the result of what seems the prima facie meaning of the statute does not even appear unreasonable. It does not seem inappropriate to place a floor at the alternate tax, leaving unused losses to their carryover utility, if any. Correspondingly, as to 1965, we do not fault the Tax Court’s conclusion that in section 172(b) (2), “ ‘taxable income’ means that taxable income to which the loss is actually applied in computing actual tax liability.” No useful purpose would be served by further elaboration on these unimportant and seldom occurring questions.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 19 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Georgia International Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner
- Pesch v. Commissioner
- Stevenson Co-Ply, Inc. v. Commissioner
- United California Bank v. United States
- Mobile Steel Company, Debtor. Elaine E. Benjamin v. Lester Y. Diamond, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Mobile Steel, Inc.
- Continental Equities, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.