TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roscoe E. Reams v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Roscoe E. REAMS, Appellant, v. Robert H. FINCH, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee

Reams v. Finch, 428 F.2d 1225 (8th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 30, 1970
Docket
No. 19955_1
Judges
Mehaffy, Gibson, Bright
Citations
428 F.2d 12251970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8412

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Roscoe E. Reams, by complaint filed in the United States district court, sought to overturn a final adjudication by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying him Social Security disability benefits under 42 U.S.C. §§ 416 (i), 423. Judge McManus dismissed the complaint, and Reams filed this appeal.

We consider the same issue that Reams submitted to the district court; whether substantial evidence supports the Secretary’s finding of fact that Reams’ dis *1226 ability produced by pulmonary emphysema did not prevent him from “engaging in substantial gainful activity”.

Reams’ emphysematous condition became manifest during late 1965. On December 7, 1966, his employer of twenty-seven years standing, Rath Packing Company of Waterloo, Iowa, terminated Reams’ employment on account of this affliction. During the summer of 1967, however, the Minneapolis Rehabilitation Center, in a week-long study, evaluated Reams’ employment skills in the light of his physical condition and found him capable and physically qualified to return to his former job as a foreman or of performing light factory work. The medical testimony concerning the disabling effect of Reams’ disease is in conflict.

Upon trial of the ease, Judge McManus found substantial evidence to support the administrative determination of the Secretary. Reams v. Finch, 313 F.Supp. 1272 (N.D.Iowa 1970).

We agree and affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 11971: 11972: 21976: 11988: 119702026peak 1972 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mary L. Hart v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare440 F.2d 1340 (5th Cir. 1971)
  2. Philip G. Miller v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare430 F.2d 321 (8th Cir. 1970)
  3. Bocian v. Mathews411 F. Supp. 1200 (N.D. Iowa 1976)
  4. Rufer v. Richardson345 F. Supp. 583 (D.S.D. 1972)
  5. Bebout v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare348 F. Supp. 227 (W.D. Mo. 1972)
  6. Conard v. Bowen710 F. Supp. 251 (S.D. Iowa 1988)

Most recent

  1. Conard v. Bowen710 F. Supp. 251 (S.D. Iowa 1988)
  2. Bocian v. Mathews411 F. Supp. 1200 (N.D. Iowa 1976)
  3. Rufer v. Richardson345 F. Supp. 583 (D.S.D. 1972)
  4. Bebout v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare348 F. Supp. 227 (W.D. Mo. 1972)
  5. Mary L. Hart v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare440 F.2d 1340 (5th Cir. 1971)
  6. Philip G. Miller v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare430 F.2d 321 (8th Cir. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Reams v. Finch, 313 F. Supp. 1272 (N.D. Iowa 1969) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list