TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ervin Hohensee v. Gene Basalyga

Ervin HOHENSEE, Appellant, v. Gene BASALYGA

Hohensee v. Basalyga, 429 F.2d 982 (3d Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 14, 1970
Docket
No. 18247_1
Judges
Freedman, Per Curiam, Seitz, Van Dusen
Citations
429 F.2d 982

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the briefs and argument on appeal, we find no error in the order appealed from.

The order of the district court, 50 F.R.D. 230 , therefore, will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hohensee v. Basalyga, 50 F.R.D. 230 (M.D. Penn. 1969) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list