TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. James E. Prince, Jr.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James E. PRINCE, Jr., Appellant

United States v. Prince, 430 F.2d 1324 (4th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 30, 1970
Docket
No. 14409_1
Judges
Haynsworth, Winter, Butzner
Citations
430 F.2d 13241971 A.M.C. 20911970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7919

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

James E. Prince appeals his conviction of aiding and abetting a hunting companion in taking a rail bird from a boat while the boat was being powered by a motor, in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 703 and 50 C.F.R. 10.3(b) (4). The evidence in Prince’s trial before the United States Commissioner disclosed that while Prince operated the motor, his companion, standing in the bow, shot a rail bird. Prince, convicted by the Commissioner, appealed to the district court, which upheld the finding of guilt. This appeal followed.

While Prince’s appeal was pending, his hunting companion was tried as a principal in the United States District Court and acquitted. His acquittal established that no crime had been committed.

Since only the two men were in the boat, Prince could have been aiding and abetting no other person. In Meredith v. United States, 238 F.2d 535, 542 (4th Cir. 1956), in considering the guilt of an aider and abettor, we said, “It need only be established that the act constituting the offense was in fact committed by someone.” See also Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262, 265 , 83 S.Ct. 1130 , 10 L.Ed.2d 335 (1963). Here, since it has been established that the act constituting the offense was not committed, Prince’s conviction as an aider and abettor must be set aside.

The judgment is reversed, and this case is remanded to the district court for entry of final judgment of acquittal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 11976: 11978: 11979: 11980: 12002: 12014: 119742026peak 1974 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. F. W. Standefer610 F.2d 1076 (3d Cir. 1979)
  2. William Mark Johnson v. David Ballard, WardenNo. 13-1006 (W. Va. Sept. 19, 2014)
  3. Standefer v. United States447 U.S. 10 (1980)
  4. People v. Lawley38 P.3d 461 (Cal. 2002)
  5. People v. Taylor527 P.2d 622 (Cal. 1974)
  6. United States of America ex rel. Robert Hubbard v. Robert S. Hatrak588 F.2d 414 (3d Cir. 1978)

Most recent

  1. William Mark Johnson v. David Ballard, WardenNo. 13-1006 (W. Va. Sept. 19, 2014)
  2. People v. Lawley38 P.3d 461 (Cal. 2002)
  3. Standefer v. United States447 U.S. 10 (1980)
  4. United States v. F. W. Standefer610 F.2d 1076 (3d Cir. 1979)
  5. United States of America ex rel. Robert Hubbard v. Robert S. Hatrak588 F.2d 414 (3d Cir. 1978)
  6. Pendry v. State367 A.2d 627 (Del. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262 (1963) 56
Meredith v. United States, 238 F.2d 535 (4th Cir. 1956) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list