TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James E. Hilson, Etc. v. W. B. Ouzts, Jr., Etc.

James E. HILSON, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. W. B. OUZTS, Jr., Etc., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Hilson v. W. B. Ouzts, Jr., Etc., 431 F.2d 955 (5th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 20, 1970
Docket
No. 30184
Judges
Bell, Ainsworth, Godbold
Citations
431 F.2d 9551970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7626

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This matter involving the public schools of Washington County, Georgia, is before us for the third time.

1

Our previous opinions are reported at 421 F.2d 632 (5 Cir., 1969) and 425 F.2d 219 (5 Cir., 1970). The history and background of this case is found in these opinions. In each instance we reversed and remanded the case with directions that the District Court proceed promptly to consider the issues before it and to decide the case consistent with Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 (1969).

The plan adopted by the District Court on the most recent remand is unsatisfactoy and does not comply with our mandate. Under the District Court’s order, desegregation of Washington County schools will be accomplished by closing the all-black Davisboro School and by sending the students from Davisboro to the present predominantly white schools, namely, Sandersville Elementary or Tennille Elementary. All vacancies in Sandersville Elementary, Tennille Elementary and Washington County High School would be filled to the respective capacity of these schools with black students, provided black students would not exceed 51 per cent of the enrollment in any of the schools. White students would be permitted, if they desired to continue to attend Sandersville Elementary, Tennille Elementary and Washington County High School.

In our view better methods are available to achieve desegregation of this county school. The judgment of the District Court must, therefore, be reversed. The District Court is directed to enter an order to achieve desegregation of Washington County, Georgia, schools as follows:

1) The School Board shall have the option either to close or zone the isolated Davisboro Academy.

2) The two high schools at Sanders-ville, namely, T. J. Elder High (black) and Washington County High, being in reasonable proximity to each other, shall be paired or zoned.

3) The two elementary schools at Ten-nille, namely, D. D. Crawford (black) and Tennille Elementary, being in reasonable proximity to each other, shall be paired or zoned.

4) The two elementary schools at San-dersville, namely, T. J. Elder Elementary (black) and Sandersville Elementary, being in reasonable proximity to each other, shall be paired or zoned.

5) If the Board chooses zoning in any instance above set forth, the attendance zones shall be strictly enforced without variance.

Appellants’ request for the allowance of attoney’s fees is denied.

This mandate shall issue forthwith and no stay will be granted pending petition for rehearing or for a writ of cer-tiorari.

Reversed and remanded.

1

. Under the stringent requirements of Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (1969), which this Court has carried out in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 852 , and of Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 396 U.S. 290 , 90 S.Ct. 608 , 24 L.Ed.2d 477 (1970), implemented in Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District, 5 Cir., 1970, 419 F.2d 1211 , this Court has judicially determined that the ordinary procedures for appellate review in school desegregation cases have to be suitably adopted to assure that each system whose case is before us “begin immediately to operate as unitary school systems.” Upon consideration of the parties’ memoranda and so much of the record as is available or determined to be needed by the Court, the Court has proceeded to dispose of this case as an extraordinary matter. Rule 2, F.R.A.P.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 119832026peak 1983 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Alexander v. Holmes Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 396 U.S. 19 (1969) 312
Carter v. West Feliciana Parish Sch. Bd., 396 U.S. 290 (1970) 184
Singleton v. Jackson Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., 419 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1969) 275
United States v. Hinds Cnty. Sch. Bd., (Civil Action No. 4075(j)) Buford A, 417 F.2d 852 (3d Cir. 1970) 13
Hilson v. W. B. Ouzts, Jr., 421 F.2d 632 (5th Cir. 1970) 4
Hilson v. W. B. Ouzts, Jr., 425 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1970) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list