TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Robert A. Katz, Trustee v. State of Connecticut and Howard S. Ives, State Highway Commissioner

Robert A. KATZ, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT and Howard S. Ives, State Highway Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees

Katz v. State of Conn. & Howard S. Ives, State Highway Comm'r, 433 F.2d 878 (2d Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 5, 1970
Docket
Nos. 83, Docket 34887
Judges
Moore, Smith, Anderson
Citations
433 F.2d 878

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the opinion of Judge Blumenfeld, 307 F.Supp. 480 in the District Court with this brief additional comment.

The appellant, Katz, at the trial before the State Referee, made the claim that the long delay by the State of Connecticut in taking the condemned property violated his rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution which prohibited the taking of his property without just compensation. The State Referee denied this claim, as the district court noted, and granted Katz an exception, but Katz did not appeal this denial to the Supreme Court of Connecticut, as he could have. Instead, he started this federal question action in the United States District Court based on precisely the same claim.

At oral argument he cited as his authority for this maneuver Foster v. City of Detroit, Michigan, 405 F.2d 138 (6 Cir. 1968), not mentioned in his brief. That case is, however, inapposite because the claim of unconstitutional taking without just compensation was not adjudicated in the Michigan state court, and therefore there was no issue of res ad judicata. It also appears that at the time the federal action was brought, the state condemnation case had been withdrawn and the subsequent state condemnation action had not been commenced.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1972: 11973: 31974: 21976: 11977: 21982: 11987: 11998: 12006: 119722026peak 1973 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Foster v. City of Detroit, Mich., and, 405 F.2d 138 (6th Cir. 1968) 102
Katz v. Connecticut, 307 F. Supp. 480 (D. Conn. 1969) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list