TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dyotherm Corporation v. Turbo MacHine Company

DYOTHERM CORPORATION, Appellant, v. TURBO MACHINE COMPANY

Dyotherm Corp. v. Turbo MacHine Co., 434 F.2d 65 (3d Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 24, 1970
Docket
No. 18823_1
Judges
McLaughlin, Seitz, Aldisert
Citations
434 F.2d 6514 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 9281970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6257

Opinion — Per Curiam

*66 OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff appeals an order of the district court, 48 F.R.D. 380 , dismissing its complaint for lack of prosecution.

Defendant moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is untimely. The district court’s order was entered on December 29, 1969. No notice of appeal was filed within 30 days thereafter. However, within the succeeding 30 days plaintiff filed what amounted to a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. It alleged excusable neglect. On February 25, 1970, the district court extended the time to file a notice of appeal until March 6, 1970. To the extent the extension exceeded 30 days, i. e., beyond February 27, 1970, it was a nullity. F.R.App;P. 26(b). No formal notice of appeal was filed by February 27, 1970. The appeal must therefore be dismissed unless, as plaintiff contends, its application for an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal can itself be considered such a notice. We think it cannot. After all, the' extension merely kept plaintiff’s options open. It gave notice of its intent to appeal when it filed its untimely notice on March 4, 1970.

The appeal from the order of the district court will be dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1972: 11973: 11975: 11979: 21981: 21982: 11988: 11989: 11991: 21992: 11997: 21998: 12006: 12025: 119722026peak 1979 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Dyotherm Corp. v. Turbo Mach. Co., 48 F.R.D. 380 (E.D. Pa. 1969) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list