TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lambert v. Brown

Stephen Michael Lambert v. The Honorable Paul Brown, Secretary of the Air Force of the United States of America, Col. Clare T. Ireland, Jr., Usaf, Commanding Officer, 62nd Maw, Lt. Col. Robert G. Denson, Usaf, Commanding Officer, 621 Oms

Lambert v. Brown, 435 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1970)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 12, 1970
Docket
No. 24594_1
Citations
435 F.2d 148

Opinion

435 F.2d 148

Stephen Michael LAMBERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The Honorable Paul BROWN, Secretary of the Air Force of the United States of America, Col. Clare T. Ireland, Jr., USAF, Commanding Officer, 62nd MAW, Lt. Col. Robert G. Denson, USAF, Commanding Officer, 621 OMS, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 24594.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 12, 1970.

Michael H. Rosen, Daniel H. Smith, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

Stan Pitkin, U.S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for appellees.

Before HAMLEY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and GOODWIN, District judge. 1

PER CURIAM:

1

Stephen Michael Lambert appeals the dismissal by the district court of his petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking discharge from the United States Air Force as a conscientious objector.

2

Since noting this appeal, it now appears that appellant has been given a General Discharge from the Air Force and is therefore no longer in the custody of appellees. We are informed that this discharge carries no continuing obligation by way of reserve duty or otherwise and that appellant's position regarding veteran's benefits is substantially the same as it would have been had he been granted an Honorable Discharge. Indeed, his position in this regard is markedly better than it would have been had he been granted the discharge he sought as a conscientious objector. See 38 U.S.C. 3103.

3

Since we know of no adverse collateral consequences of this discharge, cf. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 1556 , 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968), it is hereby ordered that this appeal be dismissed as moot.

1

Hon. Alfred T. Goodwin, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11979: 11981: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. John Brady v. U. S. Parole Commission600 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1979)
  2. Naylor v. Superior Court558 F.2d 1363 (9th Cir. 1977)
  3. Sylvester v. Hammock524 F. Supp. 53 (E.D.N.Y. 1981)

Most recent

  1. Sylvester v. Hammock524 F. Supp. 53 (E.D.N.Y. 1981)
  2. John Brady v. U. S. Parole Commission600 F.2d 234 (9th Cir. 1979)
  3. Naylor v. Superior Court558 F.2d 1363 (9th Cir. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234 (1968) 1,437

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list