TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. Economy Furniture, Inc.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ECONOMY FURNITURE, INC., Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Economy Furniture, Inc., 436 F.2d 423 (5th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 14, 1971
Docket
No. 29525
Judges
Jones, Gewin, Clark
Citations
436 F.2d 42377 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 20331971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10737

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

At a consent election conducted under the supervision of the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board, 252 votes were cast for the Union as the bargaining agent for a unit of the employees of Economy Furniture Company, 83 votes were east against the Union and nine challenged votes were not counted. The Company refused to bargain, claiming that the election was invalid and asserted a number of contentions in support of its position. In a proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board it was decided that the Company had violated Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and it was directed to bargain with the Union. Incidental relief was granted. The Board has petitioned for the enforcement of its order.

The issues, which are predominantly factual, were resolved by the Board against the Company. There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board’s findings and decision. Its order will be

Enforced.

On Rehearing — Per Curiam

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en bane, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document

436 F.2d 423

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ECONOMY FURNITURE, INC., Respondent.

No. 29525.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 27, 1971.

Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 14, 1971.

Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case)

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Judith A. Lonnquist, Chicago, Ill., for Upholsterers' International Union, AFL-CIO.

James J. Loeffler, Houston, Tex., for respondent.

Before JONES, GEWIN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

At a consent election conducted under the supervision of the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board, 252 votes were cast for the Union as the bargaining agent for a unit of the employees of Economy Furniture Company, 83 votes were cast against the Union and nine challenged votes were not counted. The Company refused to bargain, claiming that the election was invalid and asserted a number of contentions in support of its position. In a proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board it was decided that the Company had violated Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and it was directed to bargain with the Union. Incidental relief was granted. The Board has petitioned for the enforcement of its order.

2

The issues, which are predominantly factual, were resolved by the Board against the Company. There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board's findings and decision. Its order will be 3

Enforced.

4

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

5

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list