TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sidney B. Cohen v. United States

Sidney B. COHEN, A/K/A Arthur Norman Smith, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee

Cohen v. United States, 436 F.2d 586 (5th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 4, 1971
Docket
No. 30242
Judges
Bell, Ainsworth, Godbold
Citations
436 F.2d 586

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Sidney B. Cohen appeals from the District Court’s denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We affirm.

Cohen was convicted upon his plea of nolo contendere on one count of causing the interstate transportation of a counterfeit American Express traveler’s check, knowing the same to be counterfeit, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 . Four similar counts, and one count alleging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , were dismissed upon motion of the Government. There was no direct appeal.

Cohen contends that, inasmuch as the record does not indicate that the grand jury which indicted him was shown any evidence that he himself caused the counterfeit traveler’s cheek to be transported interstate, the indictment was so defective as to deprive the District Court of jurisdiction. The argument is without merit. Indictments are not open to challenge merely on the ground that the evidence before the grand jury was inadequate or incompetent. Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 363 , 76 S.Ct. 406, 408 , 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956).

Cohen further contends that his plea of nolo contendere was involuntary, and that the assistance rendered him by counsel was ineffective. The District Judge examined the transcript of the original proceeding and concluded, without an evidentiary hearing, that there was no substance to Cohen’s allegations. We agree that the records of the case conclusively show that Cohen is entitled to no relief. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ; Barrett v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 151 .

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 119712026peak 1971 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (1956) 1,591
Barrett v. United States, 302 F.2d 151 (5th Cir. 1962) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list