TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Alfred J. Cisneros v. A. C. Cavell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, Centre County, Pennsylvania

Alfred J. CISNEROS, Appellant, v. A. C. CAVELL, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, Centre County, Pennsylvania

Cisneros v. A. C. Cavell, 437 F.2d 1202 (3d Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 11, 1971
Docket
No. 18284_1
Judges
Kalodner, Freedman, Adams
Citations
437 F.2d 12021971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12435

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

A Pennsylvania court confiscated as contraband under state law $505.00 found in plaintiff’s possession when he was apprehended forty minutes after he had escaped from a Pennsylvania prison. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed, Com. v. Cisneros, 213 Pa. Super. 746 , 246 A.2d 895 (1968), and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied al-locatur.

In his instant civil rights action, plaintiff contends that the stated confiscation deprived him of his property in violation of Section 1983, 42 U.S.C.A. The District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania dismissed plaintiff’s Complaint on the ground that it failed to set forth a cause of action upon which relief could be granted, and this appeal followed.

On review of the record we find no error.

Standing alone, an action for damages for the taking of personal property or for the recovery of personal property does not lie under Section 1983. Urbano v. Calissi, 384 F.2d 909, 910-911 (3rd Cir. 1967), cert. den. 391 U.S. 925 , 88 S.Ct. 1824 , 20 L.Ed.2d 664 (1968); Howard v. Higgins, 379 F.2d 227, 228 (10th Cir. 1967). To the same effect see Eisen v. Eastman, 421 F.2d 560, 566 (2d Cir. 1969).

The Order of the District Court dismissing the Complaint will be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 11973: 11975: 11979: 119712026peak 1971 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lingo v. Boone402 F. Supp. 768 (N.D. Cal. 1975)
  2. Gigliotti v. Redevelopment Auth. of City of New Castle362 F. Supp. 764 (W.D. Pa. 1973)
  3. Peoples Cab Co. v. Bloom330 F. Supp. 1235 (W.D. Pa. 1971)
  4. Keystone Cable-Vision Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission464 F. Supp. 740 (W.D. Pa. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Keystone Cable-Vision Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission464 F. Supp. 740 (W.D. Pa. 1979)
  2. Lingo v. Boone402 F. Supp. 768 (N.D. Cal. 1975)
  3. Gigliotti v. Redevelopment Auth. of City of New Castle362 F. Supp. 764 (W.D. Pa. 1973)
  4. Peoples Cab Co. v. Bloom330 F. Supp. 1235 (W.D. Pa. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Commonwealth v. Cisneros, 246 A.2d 895 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1968) 1
Eisen v. Eastman, 421 F.2d 560 (2d Cir. 1969) 254
Howard v. Colbert Higgins,, Murray Cnty., Sulphur, Okla., 379 F.2d 227 (10th Cir. 1967) 31
Urbano v. Calissi, 384 F.2d 909 (3d Cir. 1967) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list