TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Harbor Towing Corporation, as Owner of the Tug Virginia v. Aetna Insurance Company, Harbor Towing Corporation, as Owner of the Tug Virginia, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, a Body Corporate v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., as Owner of the Steamship Steel Designer

Harbor Towing Corp., as Owner of the Tug Va. v. Aetna Ins. Co., Harbor Towing Corp., as Owner of the Tug Va., & Bethlehem Steel Corp., a Body Corporate v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., as Owner of the S.S. Steel Designer, 438 F.2d 535 (4th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 25, 1971
Docket
No. 15146_1
Citations
438 F.2d 5351971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11133

Opinion

438 F.2d 535

HARBOR TOWING CORPORATION, as Owner of the TUG VIRGINIA, Appellee, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. HARBOR TOWING CORPORATION, as Owner of the Tug Virginia, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, a body corporate, Appellees, v. ISTHMIAN LINES, INC., as owner of the steamship Steel Designer, Appellant.

Nos. 15145, 15146.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 5, 1971. Decided March 25, 1971.

Richard H. Brown, Jr., New York City, (John H. Skeen, Jr., Baltimore, Md., Arthur thur J. Blank, Jr., New York City, John J. Devine, Jr., New York City, Skeen, Wilson, & Roach, Baltimore, Md., and Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, on the brief), for appellant in No. 15,146.

Theodore R. Dankmeyer, Baltimore, Md., and Louis P. Sheinbaum, New York City (Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Baltimore, Md., and Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief), for appellant in No. 15,145.

William A. Grimes, Baltimore, Md. (John T. Ward, ober, Grimes, & Shriver, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees in Nos. 15,145 and 15,146; and David R. Owen, Baltimore, Md. (Semmes, Bowen and Semmes, Baltimore, Md., on the brief) for appellee Bethlehem Steel Corp. in No. 15146.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

In this case arising out of a collision between a ship, the Steel Designer, and a laden barge under tow by a tug, the District Judge assessed all of the damages upon the ship. In its appeal, the Steel Designer contends that the blame and the damages should b e shared with it by the towing tug, the owner of the barge or by both.

2

The appeal presents essentially factual issues. The findings of the operating facts affecting the ultimate assessment of fault are not clearly erroneous. We accept them and affirm the judgment.

3

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 11983: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Interstate Towing Co. v. Stissi717 F.2d 752 (2d Cir. 1983)
  2. Guidry v. LeBeouf Bros. Towing Co., Inc.398 F. Supp. 952 (E.D. La. 1975)

Most recent

  1. Interstate Towing Co. v. Stissi717 F.2d 752 (2d Cir. 1983)
  2. Guidry v. LeBeouf Bros. Towing Co., Inc.398 F. Supp. 952 (E.D. La. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list