United States of America, and v. William Earl Johnston
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. William Earl JOHNSTON, Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
This was a conviction for smuggling and transporting marijuana (21 U.S.C. § 176a). Johnston was caught at the Mexican border.
Here he contends he was entitled to an instruction on “lesser included offense,” to-wit: 18 U.S.C. § 545 : smuggling merchandise (without invoicing) into the United States with intent to defraud.
In another case, the contention might be correct. But here it was marijuana that was smuggled or nothing. Defendant could not be guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 545 without having violated 21 U.S.C. § 176a. So it was no error to not instruct about a lesser offense. See Olais-Castro v. United States, 9 Cir., 416 F.2d 1155 .
The mandate will issue forthwith.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.