TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Margaret Ann Fleming, a Minor, by Her Guardian, Alvin H. Frankel, and Robert Fleming & Gladys, His Wife v. Donna Berardi and Anthony Berardi, Adele Rockey v. Beryle A. Raymond

Margaret Ann Fleming, a Minor, by Her Guardian, Alvin H. Frankel, and Robert Fleming & Gladys, His Wife v. Donna Berardi and Anthony Berardi, Adele Rockey v. Beryle A. Raymond, Third-Party

Margaret Ann Fleming, a Minor, by Her Guardian, Alvin H. Frankel, & Robert Fleming & Gladys, His Wife v. Donna Berardi & Anthony Berardi, Adele Rockey v. Beryle A. Raymond, 441 F.2d 732 (3d Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 29, 1971
Docket
No. 18938
Citations
441 F.2d 73214 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 14931971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10466

Opinion

441 F.2d 732

Margaret Ann FLEMING, a minor, by her Guardian, Alvin H. Frankel, and Robert Fleming & Gladys, his wife v. Donna BERARDI and Anthony Berardi, Appellants. Adele ROCKEY v. Beryle A. RAYMOND, Third-Party Defendant.

No. 18938.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 4, 1971. Decided April 29, 1971.

William T. Campbell, Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa. (William J. McKinley, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

David I. Grunfeld, Steinberg, Greenstein, Richman & Price, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Before McLAUGHLIN and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges and HANNUM, District judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

On review of the record, showing, inter alia, that the appeal challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss the action, we do not reach the merits. 1 2

In accordance with Commonwealth of Pennyslvania v. Brown, 3 Cir., 373 F.2d 771 , at 776, where the court said:

3

'It is settled that denial of a motion to dismiss, even when the motion is based on jurisdictional grounds, is not immediately reviewable.' Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 236 , 65 S.Ct. 631, 635 , 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945).

4

for lack of an appealable order, this appeal will be dismissed.

1

Appellants urge the applicability here of Groh v. Brooks, 421 F.2d 589 (3d Cir. 1970), which held merely that the District Court was justified in its discretion in dismissing the complaint without prejudice to its reinstatement if defendants did not in fact waive the statute of limitations in the state court under the facts in that case. The state court had not refused to hear the case as here

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229 (1945) 2,349
Groh v. Brooks, 421 F.2d 589 (3d Cir. 1970) 45
Fleming v. Berardi, 441 F.2d 732 (3d Cir. 1971) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list