TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Merle Don Rothman, Trustee v. John F. Forbes & Co.

Merle Don ROTHMAN, Trustee, Appellant, v. JOHN F. FORBES & CO., Claimant, Appellee

Rothman v. John F. Forbes & Co., 442 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir. 1971)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 3, 1971
Docket
No. 25306
Judges
Chambers, Merrill, Ely
Citations
442 F.2d 13501971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9857

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

On review here are two items of accountants’ fees in the amounts of $2,-413.35 and $4,117.85 as allowed preferences in bankruptcy proceedings.

We find the allowance of the $2,413.35 was clearly erroneous, which appellee virtually concedes.

We cannot find the award of $4,117.85 was clearly erroneous.

Remanded for a modification consistent herewith.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list